Your NIL Pitch Is Competing Against Dozens. Here's What Clears the Filter.
Women's sports intelligence, straight to your inbox. Subscribe to Rising Tide →
How the shift from episodic to constant brand interest changed what successful agents say yes to
Kailey Edwards has built a collegiate roster that consistently predicts where the market is headed: Representing three of the four Power 4 conference POY winners, Edwards’ client list shows that her talent selection process gets as close to predictive as you can get without claiming clairvoyance.
This spring, that track record crystallized in the 2026 WNBA draft: Olivia Miles went No. 2 to the Minnesota Lynx, and Lauren Betts — fresh off an NCAA championship with UCLA — went No. 4 to the Washington Mystics. Both entered their first WNBA seasons with brand partnerships already in place, built before their names were called on draft night.
As a former collegiate and professional player herself, Edwards brings an athlete's perspective to representation. She’s worked in the NIL (name, image, and likeness) space for years, giving her visibility into how the commercial environment has shifted from scarcity to saturation.
Edwards evaluates every partnership offer against long-term athlete value, not just immediate deal size. Commercial interest is now constant, and that steady influx is changing what successful agents say yes to.
Key Takeaways
Female athletes provide 360-degree brand personas through nine months of televised visibility, press appearances, and organic content
Multi-year partnerships that grow with athletes create mutual value; brands entering women's sports should pursue 3-5+ year deals instead of singular campaigns
Agents representing top women's athletes now filter dozens of offers weekly for authentic fit over
What Agents Do When Everyone Wants In
Edwards sees a fundamental mismatch in how brands evaluate women's sports partnerships. Many brands chase reach metrics and one-off activations. This creates misalignment between brand expectations and athlete needs. "While there's an influx in volume, not everything is the same, not everything is worth it," Edwards notes.
Edwards pushes back on the "moment" language around women’s sports that implies the industry’s growth is temporary. "I think it's been the moment and will continue to be that for a long time" she says.
The market data confirms that this “moment” hasn’t passed by any means.
58% of Americans and 64% of sports fans now support college athletes earning through NIL.
Consumer visibility is also increasing: 43% of Americans and 50% of sports fans agree that they are seeing more brand deals and endorsements for female athletes than before.
But more deals doesn’t necessarily mean more good deals. Many of the brands flooding the market with partnership inquiries today are approaching NIL the same way they approach influencer marketing.
Agents who say yes to everything leave their athletes overextended and partnerships underperforming.
Brands that chase volume over fit will find themselves in partnerships that feel inauthentic and forced. Nowadays, athletes increasingly have the leverage to be selective. The opportunity cost is missing out on the multi-year partnerships that build durable brand association.
What to Evaluate When Opportunity Stops Being Scarce
Constant commercial interest creates a different problem than scarcity ever did. Edwards now filters partnership offers using three criteria designed for volume, not the deal-by-deal evaluation that worked when opportunities were rare.
Authentic Fit Over Reach Metrics
"The athletes that do really well are the ones that are most authentic," Edwards says. "People can tell when something doesn't fit right."
Follower count is the wrong success metric. When you can find an authentic partner, then you can grow together, and all sides win.
When Gorjana built its athlete roster, the brand prioritized authentic product use over reach metrics. Edwards saw this evaluation criteria succeed: Lauren and Sienna Betts wore their jewelry naturally in post-game interviews and campus appearances, creating unpaid visibility the brand never had to contract for.
As Gorjana has expanded to "Gorjana Sport Club" featuring Cameron Brink and Jessica Pegula, their athlete partnerships earn the credibility to scale.
The brands starting with genuine fit create foundations for category expansion. Those that optimize for reach alone find themselves cycling through partnerships that never compound value.
Athletes Provide 360-Degree Brand Value
Female athletes offer a complete, sustained brand persona. They have months of televised games, press appearances, and organic lifestyle content. This creates opportunities far beyond what brands contract for unlike an influencer whose content often lives for a campaign cycle.
When brands evaluate partnership ROI, they should factor in the organic visibility athletes generate through competition, press, and lifestyle content—not just contracted deliverables.
This 360-degree value creates a different economic model than influencer partnerships. Brands are buying sustained association with athletes who show up in contexts brands can't control or predict.
Tournament runs, draft coverage, record-breaking performances: they all create spikes in visibility that benefit existing brand partners.
Long-Term Partnership Structures Create Mutual Growth
Edwards evaluates brand partnerships for who athletes will become. The brands she selects now need capacity to grow with athletes over time.
What these deal structures look like in practice:
Multi-year terms (3-5+ years) with renewal provisions that carry athletes from college into professional careers, rather than a single-season contract that expires at graduation.
Social media growth incentives: if an athlete grows from one follower threshold to another over six months, their base competition increases or they receive a bonus. This protects both parties and creates shared upside.
First contracts designed for renewal and long-term partnerships. When athletes feel financially secure in a partnership, they produce better content and deeper engagement.
Only 180 players make a WNBA roster in any given year. For the rest, collegiate NIL partnerships are their professional career, and the brands that invested early are the ones athletes bring with them into media, coaching, business, or whatever comes next.
Where the Market Moves Next
Beyond the opportunity at the collegiate level, Edwards sees representation expanding to figure skating, volleyball, softball, lacrosse, and other sports where professional opportunities are emerging.
Olympic cycles create visibility windows for athletes in sports without major professional leagues. She notes:
“There are so many incredible athletes out there whose stories just haven't been told, haven't been as visible, or haven't had the opportunity to work with high-level agents in the past — simply because there wasn't a league for them to play in.”
For brands, this expansion means the window to build early partnerships with athletes in emerging sports is open now, while the cost of entry is still low relative to basketball and soccer.
Agents like Edwards are the ones who can translate whether a partnership aligns with where an athlete wants to build their career over the next one, five, or 20+ years. If your brand is also looking for partnerships that continue to pay off over that same horizon, this is the conversation worth having.
Compliance Note: The College Sports Commission requires clearing all deals worth more than $600 from third-party businesses. As of January 2026, the CSC had rejected 524 deals worth $14.94 million—over 10% of analyzed deal value—primarily for lacking valid business purpose or paying above market rates.
